Wakana Sonobe vs Mayu Crossley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 10:14 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Sonobe vs M. Crossley

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sonobe 1 - 0 Crossley
They have played 3 sets in total, with Wakana Sonobe winning 2 and Mayu Crossley winning 1. The last match between Wakana Sonobe and Mayu Crossley was at the W100 Cary, 03-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(2) 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sonobe | 1 |
| Crossley | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Cary(07-03-25)
W. Sonobe vs M. Crossley H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $31,400 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.96% (57-35) | Career Total W/L | 71.74% (66-26) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (2-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
W. Sonobe vs M. Crossley Match Preview:
- Who's slightly better on second serves recently? While Crossley has won 38.52% of second serve points in the past six months, Sonobe edges slightly ahead with 39.76%.
- Return game performance shows Crossley is stronger, winning 53.72% of opponents' second serve points compared to Sonobe's 50.08%. For first serve returns, Crossley leads significantly with 35.77% over Sonobe's 29.99%.
- Which player remains calm under pressure better? Sonobe has a slight advantage, saving 48.67% of breakpoints versus Crossley's 48.21%.
- Regarding overall match performance in the past year, Crossley has a superior win rate of 71.7%, compared to Sonobe's 61.29%.
- On which surface do these players perform best? Crossley excels on Clay with a 75% win rate, whereas Sonobe shines on Hard courts with a 71% win rate.
- Both players have primarily played in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Crossley winning 68.75% and Sonobe 61.54%.
- When it comes to opponent quality, Sonobe has slightly faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 311.97, while Crossley’s opponents averaged at 316.62.
- In deciding sets, Crossley has won 67% over the past year, demonstrating resilience compared to Sonobe's 58%.
- Crossley exhibits better breakpoint conversion with a 41% conversion rate versus Sonobe's 37.16%, offering a potential advantage in tight match situations.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
Crossley and Sonobe are both compelling competitors, each showcasing distinct strengths. Crossley thrives on Clay and demonstrates stronger performance in return games, a critical factor in the outcome of matches. Their breakpoint conversion rate further amplifies this advantage, allowing for capitalizing on critical match moments.
On the other hand, Sonobe presents a slight edge in handling pressure situations due to a marginally higher breakpoint save rate. Additionally, their strength on Hard courts highlights specific competencies beneficial if the surface suits their play style.
Considering recent forms and specific statistical edges, Crossley emerges as the more consistent and adaptable player. Despite Sonobe's abilities, Crossley is likely to secure a victory in this upcoming encounter.
Wakana Sonobe vs Mayu Crossley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Sonobe vs M. Crossley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 16 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:46:43 | Average Match Time | 2:46:43 |
| 55% (51/93) | 1st Serve % | 65% (64/99) |
| 59% (30/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (35/64) |
| 45% (19/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 64% (7/11) |
| 48% (48/99) | Return Points Win % | 47% (44/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Sonobe Recent Matches Played
M. Crossley Recent Matches Played

W. Sonobe vs M. Crossley Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.96% (57/35) | YTD Win/Loss | 71.74% (66/26) |
| 59.53% (128/87) | Sets Win/Loss | 68.14% (139/65) |
| 54.79% (1058/873) | Games Win/Loss | 58.19% (1091/784) |
| 63.64% (28/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.77% (30/13) |
| 61.70% (29/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 75.00% (36/12) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 165 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 329 | Total Double Faults | 282 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:54 |
| 393.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 335 |
| 56% (3146/5593) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3402/5144) |
| 64% (2021/3146) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2051/3402) |
| 46% (1118/2447) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (810/1742) |
| 51% (357/698) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (390/761) |
| 47% (2574/5466) | Return Points Win % | 51% (2654/5213) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.42% (29/19) | Challenger W/L | 68.75% (55/25) |
| 68.57% (24/11) | Futures W/L | 91.67% (11/1) |
| 62% (57/92) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 71% (65/91) |
| 44% (7/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (17/25) |
| 55% (17/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 85% (62/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (63/58) |
| 15% (62/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (63/5) |
| 13% (30/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (29/8) |